The Jakarta Method: Washington's Anticommunist Crusade and the Mass Murder Program that Shaped Our World

Vincent Bevins

Internally, when anticommunism is the ruling ideology, almost the national religion, any legitimate complain from below can easily be dismissed as communist. Anything that would be an obvious inconvenience to the small clique of rich families that run the country can be easily categorized as dangerous revolution and cast aside. This includes any web of socialism or social democracy, any land reform and any regulation that would reduce monopoly power and allow for more efficient development and market competition. It includes unions and any normal demands for workers rights.

Comentarios

Entradas populares de este blog

El capital en el siglo XXI

El capital en el siglo XXI Thomas Piketty El impuesto progresivo sobre el patrimonio individual es una institución que permite al interés general retomar el control del capitalismo, apoyándose en las fuerzas de la propiedad privada y la competencia. Si es el caso, la progresión del impuesto puede ser intensa para las fortunas más grandes, y esto puede hacerse en el marco del Estado de derecho, tras un debate democrático. Es la respuesta más idónea a la desigualdad r>g y a la desigualdad del rendimiento en función del capital inicial. Leído en 2022

Gaza, cuna de mártires

Gaza, cuna de mártires Mikel Ayestarán Los efectos de la guerra son incomparables a los dos lados de la verja; cualquier intento de igualar a los dos bandos supone una manipulación de un conflicto totalmente desproporcionado.

The Smartphone Society: Technology, Power, and Resistance in the New Gilded Age

The Smartphone Society: Technology, Power, and Resistance in the New Gilded Age Nicole Aschoff We can and should tell our own stories about the kind of society we want to live in, technology and all. In doing so, we can foster new ways of thinking about our digital-analog future. But what stories should we tell? How do we deal with the myriad issues raised by our smartphones? - privacy, autonomy, addiction, surveillance, precarity, narcissism, commodification, democracy. A growing number of voices are weighing in on these questions, which is a good thing because, unlike the techno-determinists who until recently have received a disproportionate amount of airtime, it assumes that we can do something. If our future is not to be Silicon Valley´s Dis-Utopia then what is it to be? What is our version of Utopia? Or a more manageable question, What relationship should we have with the technology and corporations that have, largely through our smartphones, come to play a central role in ...

Mis libros y citas

Buscar este blog